Sunday, February 28, 2016

34. Australia--Melbourne (Part II)

Australia--Melbourne (Part II)

Kingston Heath GC February 22, 2016:  Located in the heart of the Sandbelt, this place is a true treasure.  Historically much less known than Royal Melbourne, but many knowledgeable observers question which is better (more later).

The course was originally designed by Dan Soutar, who won the Australian Open in 1905.  Stretching to 6312 yards (par 82…no typo there) when it opened in 1925, many thought it was way too long (it was the longest in Australia at the time).  Alister Mackensie reworked KHGC’s bunkering in 1925 and that handiwork is very obvious even 90 years later.

KHGC has appeared in every one of the 35 World 100 listings that I track except for GM’s first three listings in 1979, ’81, and ’83 (all of which were Top 50’s…but that is no excuse and more proof of the questionable quality of early top 100 listings…btw…the first airplanes, cars, computers, golf clubs, etc. were of questionable quality also…most everything gets better as more effort and time is spent on it).  Highest rating has been in the Rolex guide where it has been one of 15 courses to be rated “100” giving it a “tie” for 15th in my book.  It was #16 on top100golf courses website in 2011 (currently #17) and peaked at #20 in GM in 2005 (now #28).  Very lofty ratings, but IMHO it is underrated.  It may be the finest example of brilliant yet simple architecture anywhere.  Totals 7102 yards (par 72) for professional events.  Wonderful example of strategic architecture.  My guess is that its rating “suffers” (on a relative basis) because it offers very little in the way of spectacular views.  With 18 wonderful holes, and great routing and flow, its design features are close to unmatched…even with (IMHO) only one “fantabuous” hole…#15…a midlength par 3 (155 yards), slightly uphill with all sorts of beautiful (unless you are in them) bunkers between the tee and the green.  And, my opinion of this hole was formed before I got up and down for a par from the cavernous front left bunker to a frontish pin (what a smooth way of working that in!!).

Course was in excellent condition…very firm and fast.  Bunkers here are very tough…with sand that is much finer and softer than most Sandbelt courses…these are real hazards.

How high should its rating be?  That question is very much a function of how one weighs design brilliance versus incredible views and surroundings.  There is no “right” answer to this question and both factors are key (remember…my favorite course in the world in Cypress Point…far from a slouch in terms of design brilliance but clearly its strong suit is its unmatched beauty). 

So…Royal Melbourne vs Kingston Heath??  Let’s see what I find on my return to RMGC later this week.

Victoria Golf Club, February 23, 2016:  Founded in 1903, Victoria GC moved to its present location in the Sandbelt around 1925.  Here again, Dr. Alister Mackenzie assisted with bunker design.  The result today is a relatively short (6875 yards) but brilliant track that IMHO is one of the Sandbelt’s finest.  The strength of this course is its bunkering and green complexes, and its wonderful par 3’s and short par 4’s. 

I played Victoria during my 1977 trip to Australia, but for some reason, skipped it four years ago…clearly a mistake.  Truth is remembered almost nothing from my 1977 visit.  In terms of rankings, it appeared on GM’s rankings from 1985-1997, peaking at #73 in 1987.  Its highest rating anywhere was in Planet Golf in 2009 (#65).

Best holes are:

#4…uphill 155 yard par 3...very tough.  Reminds me of #11 at Shinnecock and the approach shot on #2 at Pine Valley (not bad company);

#15…flat 320 yard driveable par 4 that turns just slightly left…with “turn” defined by string of bunkers extending from left side of fairway straight out to right side of green…these bunkers define the hole and make it brilliant.

On the negative side, I was surprised by some aspects of the course’s condition.  The greens have a lot of poa and the 13th green in particular seems to be in need of re-grassing.  Despite these conditioning questions, I consider Victoria to be the third best track in Melbourne.

Commonwealth Golf Club, February 24, 2016: Commonwealth was included on Golf Magazine’s World Top 100 in 1985-1995 (peaking at #75 in 1985) but has not appeared in any other World 100.  It is a very good course but to be honest, pales in comparison to the likes of KHGC and Victoria.  Best holes are #1, 9, 14 and 15. 

A member who I had met earlier on this trip advised that the membership was grappling with a decision as to whether they should try to reestablish Commonwealth to its former greatness.  After playing it, I would suggest (if asked) that the course would need a lot of work.  Many of the bunkers are shallow and the turf did not seem as firm as some of the other great Sandbelt tracks.  On the other hand, the club owns a vary large field (quarry??) right next door part of which would be available for new/replacement holes…and the rest could be sold to help finance the work.  Me thinks this type of decision needs a very strong majority to be successful…and people need to remember that the bar is constantly being lifted and the greatness required to make a World 100 list getting measurable harder each year.  I have certainly seen proof of that over the past few months.

Royal Melbourne Golf Club-West, February 25, 2016:  For decades recognized as one of the world’s greatest tracks. Either the West or the Composite Course  (consisting of 12 holes from W and 6 from East course) had appeared on every World Top 100 list that I track (from 7 sources)…and only once has its rating been lower that #15 in the world (on the Rolex First Edition…it scored 95, and their were 15 courses scoring 100…believe it or not, Torrey Pines-South scored 100 in the Rolex First Edition…glad I don’t depend on one of their watches for the time of day).

In terms of highest rating ever, the West (excluding ratings based on the Composite) was #4 on Planet Golf in 2009 and 2014, and its highest current rating is #6 (Planet Golf and Golf Digest).

The club was founded in 1891 and moved to the area of its present location in 1910.  After land acquisitions in 1905 (28 acres) and 1911 (68 acres), the club agreed to the construction of a new course (which would become the West) in 1926 with the design work led by Dr. Alister MacKenzie assisted by Alex Russell (a RMGC member and 1924 Australian Open champion).  In 1929 the club approved the construction of the East course designed by Russell.

In 1959, RMGC hosted the Canadian Cup (since renamed the World Cup) utilizing for the first time a “Composite Course” partly to keep the crowds off the public roads that bisect RMGC’s property.  Since then, a version of the Composite Course had been used for major events at RMGC, including two Presidents Cups (1998 and 2011) and two more World Cups (1972 and 1988).  It should be noted that in recent years all well respected rating groups have excluded Composite Courses from consideration, simply because they are not regularly available to members or raters.  To my knowledge, the only Composite Courses ever on a World or USA Top 100 are RMGC, The Country Club (MA, USA), and Royal Hong Kong GC (now Hong Kong GC).

Like most MacKenzie tracks, RMGC is relatively open with wide fairways…but green complexes that generally demand approach shots from certain angles…known as strategic design and adopted from the basic design of The Old Course in St. Andrews, Scotland.  Relatively short by todays’ stands (7000 yards), the bunkering and green complexes are the strength of RMGC-W.  In some cases the bunkers are cut right out of the green…with only green height grass up to the bunker’s edge.  Putting into a bunker is quite easy to do here.  Hitting the fairway is not a problem.  The best holes at RMGC-W in IMHO are 5-7 and 18:

#5—a 176 yard par 3 that is downhill off the tee and has its green up on a crest…with a very sharp hill in front of the green and a false front extending a good 5 yards into the front of the green (and much further when the greens are lightning fast).  The green is also very narrow in front and slopes sharply from back to front…back pin placements are protected by deep bunkers. This hole was terrifying during the 2011 Presidents Cup.

#6—a 430 par 4 dog leg right Cape hole with an approach shot (almost never from a level lie) to a green sloping sharply from back left to front right…again, just like #5, terrifying in the 2011 President’s Cup.  As I recall, Lee Trevino once called this the best and hardest par 4 he had ever seen.

#7--150 yard uphill par 3 with gapping large bunker protecting the front right of the green…as with #14 at Victoria, reminiscent of Shinnecock #11.

#18—(#12 on Composite) a 435 yard par 4 dogleg right cape hole, uphill off tee and on approach shot, with tee shot required to carry two large fairway bunkers for a shorter approach, and a reverse camber fairway on the dogleg turn…to a green sloping sharply from back to front.

One side note, the current configuration of the Composite Course drops holes #8, 9, and 13-16 from the West.

Sooo…which is it…RMGC-W or KHGC.  I still don’t have an answer, but will contemplate this important question over the next few days and attempt to answer it in my final trip report.  Next stops for us:

            King Island—Cape Wickham
            King Island—Ocean Dunes

            Tasmania—Barnbougle Dunes
Tasmania—Barnbougle Lost Farm

Hawaii—Nanea
            Hawaii—Mauna Kea

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

33. BULLETIN: Finished Golf Magazine World Top 100 lists from inception (1979) through 2013!!

BULLETIN:  Finished Golf Magazine World Top 100 lists from inception (1979) through 2013!!

Played Commonwealth Golf Club in Melbourne Sandbelt today.
After Paul putted out for bogey on 18th at Commonwealth
  
This completes all the Golf Magazine World Top 100 from when they were first published in 1979 through the list released in 2013.  Since 2013, one more list has been published (2015), and I have completed 99 of that list…missing Ellerston on the Packer family estate in New South Wales, Australia.

In addition to Ellerston, the other  “unplayed” World Top 100 EVER from Seven Sources courses are:

Cape Wickham                        Australia (King Island, TAS)
Les Bordes                              France (near Orleans)
Oligata GC (West)                  Italy (just north of Rome)
Cabot Cliffs                            Canada (Nova Scotia)
Memphremagog                      Canada (Quebec)
Sandy Lane (Green Monkey) Barbados
Querencia GC                         Mexico (Cabo)

We are scheduled to play Cape Wickham this weekend.

Next edition will cover the following courses:

Kingston Heath GC
Victoria GC
Commonwealth GC

Royal Melbourne GC-West

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

32. Australia—Melbourne (Part I)

Australia—Melbourne (Part I)

First some items that I forgot when I finished up New Zealand.

When Pat and I played Arrowtown, after the round she spotted an older gentleman (yes even older than her husband) at Arrowtown wearing a Pinehurst golf shirt.  Bill G.  is from England, (about 20 miles north of London) and has been coming to Arrowtown/Queenstown for years during the northern winter.  Simply loves the Arrowtown golf course and is clearly a lover of charming fun old golf courses.  We, of course, compared notes and thoughts.  In talking about Pinehurst, he related that he ran into a guy there who was “building a new golf course”…after a question or two it became clear that it was Dormie and Bob H.  I gave him some input on the course (very good) and the business/governance model and he immediately indicated that he suspected that was the case.

When we flew from Queenstown to Melbourne, we flew Jetstar, a low cost subsidiary of Qantas.  Due to my poor planning, we got “Jetstarred”  (e.g. ripped off) by Jetstar…and any of you planning a trip here need to be careful about this…I was not. 

Like many low cost airlines, Jetstar has a relatively low baggage allowance (in terms of weight).  I have no problem with that.  However, they also have a requirement that you declare your approximate baggage weight more that 2 hours before boarding…or you lose your “no charge” baggage allowance…and pay per kilo for every ounce of your checked baggage.  And this fact is hidden in fine print (requiring hitting links to at least levels of other websites) on the email receipt for your ticket.  So, we having not registered for our checked luggage were charged about US$1080 for luggage on a pair of tickets that cost about US$510.  I have no problem with airlines charging high fees…what I do have a problem with is when they clearly hide the terms of the fees in fine print in order to “get you”  (we were not the only ones “caught” by this trap at Queenstown).  Just a warning if you are flying Jetstar.

Other than that the flight was uneventful.  We got through Melbourne’s airport and into the city fairly quickly.  For the first time we rented an apartment form AirBnB (basically, AirBnB is to Uber as homes/apartments are to cars.  We found a gorgeous two bedroom overlooking Melbourne (on the 25th floor of a very modern apartment house in a “hot” area of Melbourne about a 15 minute walk from the central business district) for much less than we would have paid for a hotel room.  This really works well for longer stays…and given we were to be here for 8 nights, it proved to be a fabulous arrangement and deal (no…it does not offset Jetstar).  We arrived at the apartment and met our new “landlords” for the next 8 days…really nice folks…and the apartment is fabulous. 

The evening of February 18 we had dinner with old friends from Boston…Robert and Kristen Wickham.  I met Robert about 20 years ago as we were both very active in MIT alumni activities and he was living in Boston (attending Harvard B School).  Kristen is an Aussie whom Robert met while working in Australia.  They moved back to Melbourne from Boston with their two kids about 4-5 years ago, first with Oracle and now with Salesforce.com.  Robert is a squash player who has picked up golf in the past 20 years, and his game has steadily improved (when he has had time to practice).  Dinner was a wonderful catch up…and Robert was joining us for golf the next day.

Huntingdale Golf Club, Melbourne, February 19, 2016:  To my mind, there is no city in the world that offers the number of truly world-class golf courses within 25 or 50 miles of the central city as Melbourne.  New York may come close (and may surpass Melbourne when the radius is expanded to 100 miles), but I think Melbourne is the best. 

In terms of World 100’s, 10 courses within 50 miles (as the crow flies) of Melbourne have been on one of more World 100 lists (versus 9 for NYC)...and I had played six of these.  One of my missings was Huntingdale GC in the Melbourne Sandbelt.  Huntingdale originated in 1894 and moved to its present location in 1938 on a new course designed by Herbert Allison.  It started hosting the Australian Masters in 1979 and has hosted that event 30 times over the past 37 years.  Huntingdale appeared on the Golf Magazine World Top 100 in 1985, 1987, and 1989…with its highest rating being #61 in 1985.  It has not appeared in any other World Top 100 followed by yours truly.

Pat and I played with Robert and Ashley H., a member of Kingston Heath whom I “met” via email two years ago.  Ashley was very helpful with my arrangements at some of the Japanese course on my 2014 round the world trip to complete the World 100.  It was great to meet Ashley after over two years of email exchanges.  I had “met” Ashley through “Aussie John”, another Kingston Heath member who Pat and I met on our visit in 2012.  Those of you who have suffered through this blog (and its email predecessors) may recall that Aussie John surprised me in Ireland by showing up to join me as I finished the World 100 in 2014 at The European Club.  John and his wife Kay were in England then to tie the knot.  Kay is a wonderful woman, and like Pat, puts up with a somewhat crazy husband.  I also joined Aussie John late last summer during his swing thru the midwest and PA (The Golf Club, Oakmont, and Fox Chapel).  Due to a screw up by both Aussie John and American Paul, we had overbooked and had five golfers.  Aussie John volunteered to caddy for Pat (without even knowing if she is a good tipper).  Much appreciated.

We were off the first tee at 7:48, and with the first drive, it was great to be back in the Sandbelt.  Firm and fast is the rule of the day here (even with a good amount of rain over the previous 24 hours).  The turf is all fescue, and the bunkers deep and typical of Australia…deep with firm steep walls (plugged lies are few and far between…and bunker maintenance is easy).  Huntingdale has large greens with strong slopes and many interesting pin positions.  Somehow, my short game reappeared after going in hiding for the past 6-9 months.  I also was on fire with my 3 –wood and 3-utility (which were tired after lots of use as we played from about 6600 yards).  Had a 79 and was very pleased with my game.  Overall, I liked the course…it is very very good, but not World 100 today.  The bunkers are tough but the sand very firm and easy to play out of, and the position of the bunkers is wonderful (typical of Allison).  Best holes are #4, 7, 11, 12, and 17 (sorry no pics). 

Having played Huntingdale, which left me with 11 courses to complete the World 100 Ever bucket list, only two (Commonwealth and Ellerston, both in Australia) to complete the Golf Magazine World Top100 EVER bucket list, and just Commonwealth to complete GM 1979-2013.

National Golf Club (Old and Moonah courses) February 21, 2016:  After a wonderful day relaxing and playing tourists on Saturday (walking city parks, visiting Australian War Memorial, and joining Aussie John and Kay and their friends for a dinner at their house), Sunday was to be a long one.  Left the apartment before 6am and drove with Aussie John south on the Mornington Peninsula to National Golf Club, just north of the Southern Ocean.  Drive to National was about 65 miles each way.  We played with an old friend of Aussie John (and great guy), Robert T.  Played Old Course first.  Designed by Robert Trent Jones Jr. some 30 years ago, it is built on the land originally purchased by the club, on high bluffs overlooking the beach and Southern Ocean.  The views are simply spectacular, but IMHO, the golf is amazing…but strictly goofy.  Pat did not want to play 36 and there is little to do around it, so she stayed in Melbourne...which means she missed the Wallaby.   Last time she saw one was at Barnbougle four years ago...and then it appeared on the dinner menu that night!!

View of the beach and Southern Ocean from National Old

Pat's pet Wallaby

On menu tonight??

The holes are very very hilly, with long walks (thankfully we took carts…the course is almost unwalkable) from green to tee.  And the greens are multi-tiered and should have come with installed escalators (some of the fairways should have had installed elevators).  We are talking about height differences of 6’ at least between tiers.  Perhaps this course should have been named National Golf Club—Otis Course.   It does have a few very good holes…specifically #7 which plays 153 yards from the tips and 111 from the shortest tees…at very very different angles…with the Ocean in the distance behind the green




Natl Old #7 from back tee


Natl Old from Front Tee---right front go free much more prominent


Of course, it also has one of the world’s only dogleg par 3’s…the 16th, which on this day had the pin hidden behind the dogleg/mound (which may be why I was able to hit it to 4’ and make my birdie).

The greens were not in good shape…looked like the members never repair ball marks.
Natl Old par 3 #4--downhill

Natl Old par 5 #5...uphill enough for mountain goats



Natl Old par 4 #15--dogleg right, way way downhill (whatever goes up must come down)


Jones Jr. calls this track “one of the true tests of golf and the game anywhere.”  I shall not comment in reply.  Outside of its views…see the beach in the background below…it has little in the way of redeeming values.  It started with a very poor site selection…way too hilly, and then went downhill (no pun intended) from there.  But then again, the folks at Golf Digest deemed this one to be the 87th greatest golf course in the world in their 2016 listing (never been on any other Top 100 list).  Maybe I’m crazy, or maybe there just is no accounting for tastes (or perhaps both).

For those of you who claim I only like the courses where I play well, or vice versa (Bob K…you know who I mean), I had a 42-39 = 82, playing from about 5900 yards (plays 6950 yards from the back) in very windy conditions.

After a good lunch, it was over to the Moonah course, which derives its name from an indigenous tree.  About 10 years after the opening of the National, the club was able to purchase a farm next door…on relatively flat land (but beautifully rolling terrain)…large enough for two other courses…the Ocean and the Moonah.  A new clubhouse was built to provice one central starting point, which required a re-routing of the Old (named the Old at that point) so that it now started at the original 5th hole (with the original 18th now being the 14th) and then kept the same hole order…see below:

New Hole # 1  2   3   4   5   6   7   8  9  10  11 12  13  14  15  16  17  18
Old Hole #   5  6   7  8  9  10 11  12 13 14  15 16  17  18   1    2    3    4

Confused enough?

The architects selected were Peter Thompson for the Ocean (and he had first divvies on land selection) and Greg Norman for the Moonah.  We did not see the Ocean but it has never received much acclaim.  The Moonah, on the other hand, has been on the following World Top 100 lists:

Top100golf courses.co.uk                  2011 #87
                                                            2012 #90
                                                            2014 #99
Planet Golf                                          2009 #33
                                                            2014 #69
                                                            2015 #64

I really liked this course and would place it in about the #90-110 place.  It does not have great views of the ocean and beach, but it does have 18 fine golf holes…and one of the best set of par 3’s I have seen.  


Natl Moonah par 3 #5 150 yards...first of four great par 3's
Played very firm and fast…and the greens were in great shape…few if any unrepaired ball marks.  Wind was strong in the afternoon…and this was a tough wind…helping on a bunch of short holes and against on most longer holes.  In fact, I hit approach shots over on three consecutive holes playing downwind.  I cannot remember the last time I did that.  Played well…had a 42-38 = 80 from 6200 yards (it is about 7250 from the tips). 

Having now played these two at National, I have 9 courses (of 284 courses) on the World Top 100 EVER bucket list left…and included in this are 2 unplayed (out of 194 courses) on the Golf Magazine World Top 100 EVER list.